Symposium 2006
Menu


Symposium Photos
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 





Main page » symposium2006 »free papers abstract

經過一番激烈的角逐, 年青外科醫生論文比賽結果:

第一名: 姚絢醫生; 林茹蓮醫生(並列第一)

第三名: 柳曉輝醫生

最激烈場面: 請進入澳門外科學會會訊部份之Free Paper Session

 
Abstract of Free Papers in Symposium 2006 (排名不分先後)

 

1) Aanalysis for reasons of conversion from laparoscopic cholecystectomy to laparotomy (Dr. Lei Man Sang)

2) Stapled hemorrhoidopexy – an audit of its long term efficacy (Dr. Io Shun)

3) Laparoscopic assisted (LAC)Versus Open Colectomy (OC) for Colon Carcinoma: A Retrospective Analysis with safe and curative intent for Patients in Macau (Dr. Kuok Chi Ian)

4) Laparoscopic repair of Perforated duodenal ulcer (Dr. I.L. Leong)

5) Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in Kiang Wu Hospital (Dr.UL. Lam)

6) Early Experience of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Kiang Wu Hospital (Dr Ka.Kui. Ho)

7) Transurethral Prostatectomy in High-risk Patients (Dr H. F. Lao)

 
##Free Papers ScoreSheet
 

1) Aanalysis for reasons of conversion from laparoscopic cholecystectomy to laparotomy

Lei Mansang, Genaral surgery, CHCSJ

Background and Objective: The first case of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) performed by Frenchman Mouret in 1987. Now the laparoscopic surgery technique has developed for more than 20 years.  It is regarded as a very mature technique, especially for cholecystectomy.  Except some regions which laparoscopic surgery has not been promoted or due to some patients’ financial problem, laparoscopic cholecystectomy has almost completely replaced conventional open cholecystectomy. As a relatively new and developing micro-invasive surgical technique, sometimes there may be serious intra-operation complications and need to perform conversion to open cholecystectomy.  The possible reasons might be the limitation of the technique and instruments, instrumental disorders, insufficiency of surgeon’s skill and experiences, etc.  The logical and timely decision on conversion indicate high responsible for the patients.
Some learners had studied analysis of reason on conversion from LC to laparotomy. Conclusions had obvious difference among them as the result of sample quantity or limitation of study condition. Clinical materials of 3400 patients, which were collected in our study, were retrospectively analyzed through new statistic method. The reasons on conversion were put forward and effect of high risk factors on conversion rates was studied. These results could provide theoretical evidence for promoting LC security and decreasing conversion rates. 
Methods: Clinical materials of 3400 patients undergoing LC were retrospectively analyzed which were collected in the Guangzhou overseas Chinese hospital and Macau Centro Hospitalar Conde de São Januário since the laparoscopic technique was developed in two hospitals. 42 patients of these cases required conversion intraoperative. Clinical materials of 42 patients were summarized and then the reasons on conversion were analyzed in detail. 3400 patients were divided into two groups: LC successful group and LC conversion group.  Materials of two groups were compared through t test and x2 test. Risk factors causing conversion were screened out. Next step was to evaluate these risk factors by Logistic regression analysis and filtrate risk factors by exclude method. In the end OR ratio of risk factors was calculated. Degree of effect on LC conversion rates was observed.
Results: LC of 3358 patients successfully completed and conversion to laparotomy was required on the 42 patients. All patients recovered well postoperatively and left hospital under the condition of cure. Serious postoperative complications were brought out. Reasons causing conversion were the following: illegibility of anatomy structure caused by celiac and local inflammation and adhesion 21 cases (50%), hemorrhage 6 cases (14.3%), bile duct injury and bile leak 6 cases (14.3%), gastrointestinal injury 4 cases (10%), Mirrizi syndrome 3 cases (7.1%), gallbladder cancer 1 case (2.4%) and middle bile duct cancer 1 case (2.4%).   
The contrast analysis of risk factors between two groups indicated the following through single factor analysis: there was no significant difference in age, sex and history of diabetes  (P>0.05) while there was significant difference in nine risk factors such as history of hypertension, coronary heart disease and fatness and so on (P<0.05).
Then the significant factors chosen in the single factor analysis were evaluated by multi-factors analysis (Logistic regression analysis). The history of hypertension, pregnancy and cruor dysfunction were eliminated (P>0.05). There was significant difference in the histories of hypertension, laparotomy, pancreatitis and cholecystitis outbreak, fatness and experience of the operators (P<0.05). History of upper abdominal laparotomy was most significant as for the decision on the operative fashion (OR=2.94).  
Conclusions: Conversion to laparotomy was required in time when the followings were discovered such as illegibility of anatomy structure caused by celiac adhesion, resection difficulties of LC, important blood vessel and viscera and bile duct damaged as the result of anatomy variance, Mirrizi syndrome and malignancy suspected in the gallbladder or bile duct. The six factors were risk factors to cause conversion from LC to laparotomy such as history of hypertension, fatness, experience of operators and history of laparotomy and so on.
Patient with more risk factors suggested more difficult during LC and more chance to converse. Thus, a pre-operation general estimation and analysis for these risk factors may lead to better guidance for choosing mode of operation, and may reduce the possibility of conversion.
Key Words laparoscopic cholecystectomy ; conversion to laparotomy ; laparoscopy ; celiac adhesion; anatomy variance

2) Stapled hemorrhoidopexy – an audit of its long term efficacy

Shun.Io, Jeffrey, M.L.Chu, M.Kong, Ivan,H.F.Sek, Peter,H.M.Tung, Peter,W.K.Lau

Department of Surgery, Kiang Wu Hospital, Macau, China
BACKGROUND & PURPOSE: In comparison to conventional hemorrhoidectomy previous studies indicated Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy (SH) reduces post-op pain. However its long term efficacy to deal with the hemorrhoids must be reasonable before the technique can be widely adopted. We therefore evaluated our four years experience in Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy with special emphasis on its complications and its long term efficacy in the control hemorrhoidal symptoms.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent surgery for hemorrhoids from 2002 to 2005. 131 patients underwent Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy and 66 patients had closed Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy. Only the new procedure was analyzed. Case notes were retrieved and data on pre-op symptoms, the operation, complications and post-op follow up were extracted. In an effort to have the most up to date information on the control of symptoms, a telephone survey was conducted using a standardized questionnaire.
RESULTS: Overall the complications rates were acceptable. Urinary retention developed in 47 patients (36%), post-op bleeding in 3 (2.3 %), and 2 patients (1.5%) developed anal soft stricture. The mean or median length of our follow up was 16 months (4-44 months). The predominant symptoms which led to the surgery was bleeding, prolapse, and both. This occurred in 44 (33.6%), 20 (15.3%), 67 (51%) respectively. The corresponding assessment of post-op symptom was 9 (6.9%), 7 (5.3%, and 4 (3.0%) respectively. Also reviewed 89.1% of patients felt the procedure had cured their hemorrhoids, 6% reported no effect and 4.8% felt it was detrimental.
DISCUSSION: Our emphasis on the control of symptoms is base on the fact that benign diseases require treatment only if the patients find the symptoms unacceptable. The treatment of hemorrhoids obviously falls into this category. The absences of a control group or comparison with another treatment modality, together with its retrospective nature are obvious shortcomings of the present study.

CONCLUSION: In our hands Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy is a save procedure with minimal complications. The long term effectiveness of the procedure in the control of hemorrhoidal symptoms is also excellent. In addition, during our review, we found a 51% incident of harboring polyp in those who underwent colonoscopy.

3) Laparoscopic assisted (LAC)Versus Open Colectomy (OC) for Colon Carcinoma: A Retrospective Analysis with safe and curative intent for Patients in Macau

Kuok Chi Ian, Genaral surgery, CHCSJ

AIM: To evaluate the result of laparoscopic assisted colectomy in treatment of colon cancer in Macau in terms of surgical safety, oncological clearance, recurrence and survival.
METHODS:  A retrospective review was performed of all 61 patients with colon cancer treated with laparoscopy (22 cases) or open technique (39 cases) by surgeons in general surgery department of one hospital in Macau from October 2000 to November 2004. Operation times, blood loss, postoperative recovery, oncological clearance (length of specimen and lymph node yield), and follow-up results (local recurrence and distal metastasis, cumulative survival probability) were analyzed.

RESULTS: Analgesia (Tramadol) required postoperatively by patients in LAC groups as well as times for flatus passage, time to resume early activity, and hospital stay showed the following figures: (500±527.347)mg, (2.57±0.978)d,(6.19±1.914)d,(3.14±1.315)d. All results were significantly less/ shorter than those in OC group. The differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). There is no significant difference in the length of intestinal specimens, resection margin or the number of lymph node harvested between laparoscopic and open colon resection for cancer. The lengths of the specimens; distal surgical margin; proximal surgical margin and the number of total lymph nodes in LAC and OC showed the following figures:  (18.836±7.1780)cm vs (20.674±7.5617)cm; (7.341±4.0880)cm vs (8.349±5.6046)cm; (6.595±3.5885)cm vs (7.964±3.7830)cm; (20.32±10.745) vs (25.95±13.803) respectively. All the patients were followed-up. The mean follow-up time was 32.21±14.457 months. The mean follow-up time was 35.32±15.542 months (range 12-66 month) for LAC and 30.46±13.703 months (range 8-62 month) for OC. The local recurrence rate;  port site recurrence rate; and distal metastasis rate in LAC and OC showed the following figures: 18.2%(4/22) vs 15.4%(6/39);  4.5%(1/22) vs 0%(0/39); 4.5%(1/22) vs 12.8(5/39) respectively. Short term (Mean 32 mo; Longest≤5 years, 60 mo) cumulative disease(cancer)-free survival rate (the length of time after treatment during which no disease is found) was 77.88% in LAC and 76.58% in OC. Short term (Mean 32 mo; Longest≤5 years, 60 mo) cumulative survival probabilities at LAC group and OC group were 82.35% and 85.20%, respectively. No significant difference was found between groups (Log-rank test: P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS: In Macau, Laparoscopically assisted colectomy for colon cancer has the same oncological clearance (lymph node yield and clean surgical margins) and short term (Mean 32 mo; Longest≤5 years, 60 mo) survival rate as open procedure. It is also associated with lesser trauma and blood loss, more safety, quicker convalescence when compared with open colectomy.

4) Laparoscopic repair of Perforated duodenal ulcer
I.L. Leong, T.Y. Lam, Manson Fok.

Department of surgery, Kiang Wu Hospital, Macau SAR, China

BackgroundPerforated duodenal ulcer is an abdominal surgical emergency. While open  omental patch is the treatment for this disease, laparoscopic repair is gaining acceptance as an acceptable therapeutic option.

ObjectiveTo retrospectively compare the outcome of laparoscopic and open procedures for perforated duodenal ulcer.

Methods:Between February 2003 and May 2006, 55 consecutive patients (48 male and 7 female) admitted with perforated duodenal perforation. Nineteen patients were treated laparoscopically, and 36 patients had open surgery.
Results:Eighteen patients gave a history of gastroduodenal ulcer, and the other patients were acute perforation. Emergency surgery, irrespective of the approach, was performed within the first 24 hours among 48 (88%) patients. The surgeon would decide the mode of surgery depending on the Boey’s factors. Laparoscopic suture omental patch repair was successful in 18 cases (95%). Mean size of between two groups was 4.6mm and 7.1mm (p<0.05). The mean operating time in laparoscopic and open surgery was 84.2 and 84.7 minutes respectively (N.S.), the duration of postoperative nasogastric aspiration was shorter in laparoscopic group (2.7 Vs 3.6 days). The postoperative analgetic requirement was lower than open repair (mean dose, 0.5Vs 1.3, p<0.05). The duration of drainage was shorter than open surgery (3.7 Vs 4.8 days). But there was no statistically significant difference in hospital stay and complications rate between the two approaches. There was one death (2.8%) from pneumonia in the Open group .

Conclusion:Laparoscopic repair of duodenal perforation is an efficient and safe emergency therapy, it offers more advantages than open.

5) Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in Kiang Wu Hospital

U. L. Lam, F. Z. Nie, S.Y. Zhu, W. Song, E. C. S. Lai

Department of Surgery, Kiang Wu Hospital, Macau SAR, PRC

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the early experience in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) at our hospital.

METHODS:  All patients undergoing ERCP from January 2002 to December 2005 were included in this study. Patient profiles, indications, diagnosis, ERCP technqiues and findings, post-operative complications were retrospectively collected for analysis

RESULTS:  A total of 265 patients (male 158 / female 163 ; median age 69 (19-95)  had a total of 321 ERCPs, of which 69% therapeutic and 39% emergent ERCP was performed.  The commonest indication of ERCP was choledocholithiasis (n=167; 52%), among whom 83 presented with acute cholangitis, and 64 had pancreatitis, followed by medical jaundice (n=45; 14%), malignant obstruction (n=39; 12.1%), intrahepatic stones (n=23; 7.2%), benign stricture (n=6; 1.9%) and bile duct leak (n=2; 0.6%).  While the overall successful cannulation rate was 83 %; patients with biliary calculi (93%) had a higher success rate than those with malignant biliary obstruction (74.4%; p < 0.002).  Endoscopic sphincterotomy was conducted in 158 patients (49%) with a successful rate of 94%. Standard sphincterotome was used in the majority of cases (126 patients; 80%) but needle knife (32 patients; 20%) was used more frequently in recent years with increased participation of trainees.  Almost half of the patients (48%) underwent stone extraction. The overall ductal clearance rate of on the first attempt, second attempt and third attempt were 72%, 94% and 99%, respectively. Stent placement was used in 46 patients as a temporary drainage procedure to control fulminating biliary sepsis (11 patients) and incomplete ductal clearance pending follow-up endoscopy (35 patients), of which 35 pig-tial stents, 2 nasal-biliary drainage catheters and 9 straight stents were placed.  In terms of malignant obstruction, 14 straight stents, 7 pig-tail stents and 1 nasal-biliary catheter were used as temporary biliary drainage. Three self-expandable metallic stents (4.2%) were adopted as a palliative treatment in inoperable cases. Complications were noted in 17 patients (5.2%), namely post-ERCP pancreatitis (4%), bleeding (0.6%) and gastrointestinal perforation (0.6%) necessitating surgery in 2 patients (0.6 %). Three 30-day deaths (0.9%) from terminal malignancy was found. There was no procedure-related mortality.

CONCLUSIONS:  In the early phase of our service, the experience of ERCP in Kiang Wu Hospital is satisfactory even when training is part of our program.

6) Early Experience of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Kiang Wu Hospital
K.K. Ho, F.Z. Nie, W. Sung ; ECS Lai
Department of Surgery, Kiang Wu Hospital, Macao SAR, PRC

Abstract
Objective: To evaluated the development of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Kiang Wu hospital.
Method: Details of all patients for undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Kiang Wu hospital from January 2002 to December 2005 were reviewed retrospectively.

Result: A total of 381 patients (148 male; 233 female; mean age: 56.0 years (range, 16~93years)) were analyzed. Common duct stones were found in 71 patients (18.6%). The mean operation time was 98 min. The hospital stay after operation was 4.8 days. Conversions were noted in 27 cases (7.1%), including difficult anatomy, 19 patients (5.0%), bile duct injury, one patient (0.3%), bile leakage, three cases (0.8%), cystic artery bleeding, three cases (0.8%), and intolerance to pneumoperitoneum, one case (0.3%). Complications were noted in 11 patients (2.9 %): cardiopulmonary infection, two cases (0.5%), bile duct injury, two cases (0.5%), bile leakage, 5 cases (1.3%), wound infection, two cases (0.5%). There was no mortality. There were 80 cases (21%) acute cholecystitis and 301 cases (79%) chronic cholecystits were noted and either mean operation time (111.2 vs. 95.5 min; P=0.009) or conversion rate (17.5% vs. 4.6%; P<0.001) was higher in the acute group, the complication rate in acute group is higher (6.5% vs. 2.0%) but no significance (P=0.1). Average operation time in early (first 100 cases) was higher than the latter (last 100 cases) group (116.7 vs. 99.1; P=0.005). The conversion rate in early group was higher (12% vs. 2%; P=0.006), but no significance in complication rate (5% vs. 1%; P=0.212).
Conclusion: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a safe and feasible procedure in Kiang Wu hospital. The peri-operative outcome showed a steadfast improvement with increasing experience.

07) Transurethral Prostatectomy in High-risk Patients

H. F. Lao, K. W. Ho, L. G. Ng, W. Y. Cheung, T. I. Chan, Francis Lee, Richard K. Lo

Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Kiang-Wu Hospital, Macau SAR, PRC

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the local experience of transurethral prostatectomy (TURP) on the high-risk patients at Kiang Wu Hospital.

METHODS:  From January 2002 to December 2005, 298 patients undergoing TURP were retrospectively evaluated.  Of which 134 patients with either age  > 80 years old, with three or more co-morbidities, previous malignancy or ASA score > 3 were defined as high-risk patients (group 1), while the other 164 patients were low-risk patients (group 2). The patient profiles, indications, operation time, blood loss, postoperative irrigation time, complications and pathology of the 2 groups were compared.

RESULTS:  The mean age of patients operated was 74.7 years (48 to 96 years). In Group 1 and Group 2, the mean age was (80.5+7.1) years and (70+6.8) years.

The commonest indication of TURP was acute urinary retention (n=104; 39%), among whom (n=51; 17%) patients presented with hematuria.
Total PSA, prostate volume, pre-operation hematuria and pre-operation retention were similar in both groups. The following results of the two groups as well showed no difference, mean resected prostate weight (27+62) g vs (26+17) g (p=0.847); blood loss, (213+152) ml vs (267+181) ml (p=0.060); blood transfusion, (n=6, 4.6%) vs (n=4, 2.5%) (p=0.255); days of Foley indwelling, (4.6+2.0) days vs (4.4+1.4) days (p=0.297); days of bladder irrigation, (2.9+1.9) days vs (2.6+1.4) days (p=0.160). The mean operation time for the high-risk group and the low-risk group was (47+22) minutes and (56+29) minutes, respectively (p=0.03). Total fluid irrigation was (15380+7680) ml and (18950+10470) ml (p=0.01). Both operation time and total fluid irrigation were significantly shorter in group 1. The commonest postoperative complication was fever, which occurred (n=14, 10.5%) in group 1 and (n=16, 9.9%) in group 2. There were no significant differences between the two groups in other postoperative complications. The mortality rate had been low since we started using TURP for surgical management of our BPH patients. There were 2 deaths in group 1.

CONCLUSIONS:  With even shorter operation time and lesser amount of fluid irrigation , TURP is as safe and efficacious in the treatment for high-risk BPH patients as in the low-risk group.

The Panel of free paper

Paper No.

Title :

Presenter

 

Abstract

 

10

Scientific

Originality

 

20

Data collection

 

20

Data analysis

 

20

Validity of Conclusion

 

20

Presentation

Clarity

 

15

Preparation

 

15

Total Score                                           120

Comment

 

Go to the title ahead
Posted by: Jeffrey |
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Copyright Macau Surgical Association 2006